Fuck you!
Ok, but seriously, you are one of the most idiotic sheeple, and I'm about to get to the reasons of why I think that.
Whenever there's a day that many of the citizens of the shithole I live in (and not just here) devote to visiting a stone structure and put plants that are condemned beside it, in order to seemingly show their respect for people that fell in war or fought for a certain government, my feelings (if I am aware of that, which is not often) are usually a mixup of pity and ironiy, and when I express that, I often hear that the people that participated in war were ''heroes'' or that they fought ''for a scumbag like me to live in a free country'', and I cannot help but get angry at the individual saying that.
First off, the argument that those people fought that I, or my generation would live in a free/good conditions is automatically false. Any state and government means lack of freedom, period. You cannot be free if you are restricted by anything, including laws. And you folks, to whom freedom means that you can vote for one of the lesser evils, rather than live without it, I cannot respect you. The people that died could not know what the outcome of my generation would be if they had lost the war, just as they could not have fought for me, because I simply didn't exist then, therefore, nobody could know what I'd want. This argument goes right into the arse.
Then there are folks who, instead of spewing out patriotic messages, start saying that ''you have to respect the dead.'' What? Why? Why do you have to respect the dead more than the people that are alive? And why the hell would you grant respect to someone, who doesn't deserve it according to your system of values? Not to mention that dead do not give a fuck what you think/say about them and whether or not you respect them. They are dead, they do not exist anymore. Just because your parents have taught you to respect the dead and you are brainless and gutless enough not to question that doesn't mean I will or should do the same.
Patriotism just seems like a completely idiotic thing to me. I mean, yes, you were born in a certain country, but, did you choose to do so? No, you were put here by chance. If you have positive feelings toward a certain country just because you were born or grew up there, you better start feeling patriotic for the whole world, cause, it could have been so that you would be born in another place/family/setting, since you didn't choose it. Why would you feel proud for something you never chose or had an impact on? It's like being proud with someone's contributions to society. You might as well as start being proud with Mona Lisa and Einsteins theories, to mention a few. That seems just plain dumb.
Same goes to loving relatives just because they are, well, your relatives. If people deserve to be treated good and loved by their actions, then they should be loved, but granting them such feelings just because they share certain genes with you seems as dumb to me as patriotism.
Oh, and returning to the dead do not care argument, can anyone explain me, what do you accomplish by showing respect to dead people and leaving flowers next to a stone structure? I certainly don't get the meaning behind such behaviour.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
You guys are a bunch of arrogant imbeciles, stop thinking everyone is like you or someone you know, they're not.
Projection is a faulty method used to gain understanding of how the other person may feel or behave in a certain situation.
I just flashbacked on what my not-too-bright philosophy teacher told me last friday. When she was talking about power, she mentioned that, after marriage, the female often starts displaying her power by making the husband behave in a certain way. My response was that ''It's the man's fault he decided to give up his balls and participate in such an imbecilic ritual as marriage.'' The talk escalated into me stating that, rather than performing an absolutely unneeded ritual (marriage), I die alone. Of course, the classmates did not like this idea, and especially, me saying that ''A woman that makes an ultimatum for her man to marry her or she will leave is worth less than a piece of shit to me.''
A classmate of mine asked, what would I do, if a woman would demand me to marry her in order to, for example, living with me. I said that I'd tell her to go fuck herself. Same applies to any woman ever giving me the line of ''No sex before marriage.'' Why? Simple. If you need a ritual that is essentially meaningless to me, costly, and pretty much unnecessary in order to have a relationship, you are faulty, faulty in the sense of not desiring to work for a relationship and being too insecure to believe that a relationship can be maintained without marriage. Sure, it takes a lot more trust and effort, since you don't start taking many things for granted as you do in a marriage, but, if you cannot handle it anyway, then the marriage wouldn't be worth it.
The whole deal, however, ended with my classmates (who are, I presume, obsessed with the thought of starting a family in the traditional sense of the word, as well as desiring to procreate and have a marriage) shunning me and the teacher telling me that she knows a man that was saying something similar to what I was - her husband.
And this is where we get to the main point, she was implying that, because she knew someone who had a similar stance to mine and changed it, the same thing will happen to me.
Same applies to what my mother said about me being an atheist. That I will experience something that will make me believe in a christian god, just like she did.
And this is a fault of most people. We assume things. We assume that, just because a certain person acted a certain way in a certain situation, everyone else with a seemingly similar setting and position regarding a certain idea will act the same way. False.
Why? Simple, people are not all the same. Since everyone is an individual and is formed by a different set of external factors (not to mention the internal ones that arise from the external), no two people are exactly the same, unless they have an identical starting point (biological and genetic makeup, as well as situation), and live an identical life, which is not possible, thus, assuming that everyone will act the same way you or someone you knew acted in a certain situation is just plain short-sighted and, at times, even arrogant.
Sure, some situations imply a limited choice of behaviours, for example, it is unlikely that a person that has a gun put to its head and is told that it will be killed, will try to jump up to the moon, it does not mean that such a thing will never happen.
So, what I want to say is that, people should make less assumptions and project own (or people known) personalities to people that seem to have similar personalities to a known person, because, if you or someone you know acted like that, does not mean that this person will do the same.
I just flashbacked on what my not-too-bright philosophy teacher told me last friday. When she was talking about power, she mentioned that, after marriage, the female often starts displaying her power by making the husband behave in a certain way. My response was that ''It's the man's fault he decided to give up his balls and participate in such an imbecilic ritual as marriage.'' The talk escalated into me stating that, rather than performing an absolutely unneeded ritual (marriage), I die alone. Of course, the classmates did not like this idea, and especially, me saying that ''A woman that makes an ultimatum for her man to marry her or she will leave is worth less than a piece of shit to me.''
A classmate of mine asked, what would I do, if a woman would demand me to marry her in order to, for example, living with me. I said that I'd tell her to go fuck herself. Same applies to any woman ever giving me the line of ''No sex before marriage.'' Why? Simple. If you need a ritual that is essentially meaningless to me, costly, and pretty much unnecessary in order to have a relationship, you are faulty, faulty in the sense of not desiring to work for a relationship and being too insecure to believe that a relationship can be maintained without marriage. Sure, it takes a lot more trust and effort, since you don't start taking many things for granted as you do in a marriage, but, if you cannot handle it anyway, then the marriage wouldn't be worth it.
The whole deal, however, ended with my classmates (who are, I presume, obsessed with the thought of starting a family in the traditional sense of the word, as well as desiring to procreate and have a marriage) shunning me and the teacher telling me that she knows a man that was saying something similar to what I was - her husband.
And this is where we get to the main point, she was implying that, because she knew someone who had a similar stance to mine and changed it, the same thing will happen to me.
Same applies to what my mother said about me being an atheist. That I will experience something that will make me believe in a christian god, just like she did.
And this is a fault of most people. We assume things. We assume that, just because a certain person acted a certain way in a certain situation, everyone else with a seemingly similar setting and position regarding a certain idea will act the same way. False.
Why? Simple, people are not all the same. Since everyone is an individual and is formed by a different set of external factors (not to mention the internal ones that arise from the external), no two people are exactly the same, unless they have an identical starting point (biological and genetic makeup, as well as situation), and live an identical life, which is not possible, thus, assuming that everyone will act the same way you or someone you knew acted in a certain situation is just plain short-sighted and, at times, even arrogant.
Sure, some situations imply a limited choice of behaviours, for example, it is unlikely that a person that has a gun put to its head and is told that it will be killed, will try to jump up to the moon, it does not mean that such a thing will never happen.
So, what I want to say is that, people should make less assumptions and project own (or people known) personalities to people that seem to have similar personalities to a known person, because, if you or someone you know acted like that, does not mean that this person will do the same.
Thursday, May 5, 2011
And you thought I could be nice when you're such a shithead.
I'm not sure of anything anymore. It just seems so that people cannot be trusted, and, if I'm proven right at that again, well, just fuck that. I'm sick of being so alone, yet, whenever I try to connect with someone, they fail me. It is always like that. Whether it's the way they treat me, or maybe it's just that my expectations are too high. Hell, people aren't worth shit, yet, the darn evolutionary mechanism requires social interaction. I mean, it's only sensible, it is easier to survive in a group than in solitude, not to mention the fact that genes tend to reproduce and that is impossible without any kind of interaction with the same species.
If I will be proven right, god help you. Because then, I will be nasty, oh, very nasty. See, people oftentimes think that some people are just born evil. It isn't necessary so. Some people, like me, are shaped like this, we become evil, because that is how we deal with the malevolent world around us. In fact, we're not much more evil than others, we're just way less nice to the people that pretend to be nice towards us. We are cynical and hateful, and we would devour anyone, because that's what you taught us, dear mom and dad, and peers and just some random shitheads that had nothing else to do but to fuck with some innocent person for the sheer fun of it. You create the likes of me, and although it is up to us whether we accept us in the evil way or not, ultimately, if things were different, we'd be too, so, ultimately, your fault is the biggest. You make a kid see the world as a malevolent place, don't wonder why he doesn't want to live in reality afterwards.
If I am proven right, god help you, for then my boundaries will extend further, and petty vandalism crime will be least of your concerns from me. If I am led too far with this, homicide will take place. If you keep failing me like this, at some point I'll start killing you. One by one.
If I will be proven right, god help you. Because then, I will be nasty, oh, very nasty. See, people oftentimes think that some people are just born evil. It isn't necessary so. Some people, like me, are shaped like this, we become evil, because that is how we deal with the malevolent world around us. In fact, we're not much more evil than others, we're just way less nice to the people that pretend to be nice towards us. We are cynical and hateful, and we would devour anyone, because that's what you taught us, dear mom and dad, and peers and just some random shitheads that had nothing else to do but to fuck with some innocent person for the sheer fun of it. You create the likes of me, and although it is up to us whether we accept us in the evil way or not, ultimately, if things were different, we'd be too, so, ultimately, your fault is the biggest. You make a kid see the world as a malevolent place, don't wonder why he doesn't want to live in reality afterwards.
If I am proven right, god help you, for then my boundaries will extend further, and petty vandalism crime will be least of your concerns from me. If I am led too far with this, homicide will take place. If you keep failing me like this, at some point I'll start killing you. One by one.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)